---
title: How De-Risking Will Crush Micro, Small and Medium Companies
description: What are the risks of de-risking for Micro, Small and Medium companies, the backbone of the global economy? Read it here first!
url: https://esgthereport.com/how-de-risking-will-crush-micro-small-and-medium-companies
date_modified: 2026-03-18
author: esgthereport
language: en_US
---

The global economy feels like a high-stakes game of Tetris where the blocks are moving faster than ever. Between shifting tariffs, fluctuating oil prices, and the looming specter of regional conflicts, uncertainty has become the only constant. For the C-suite and ESG professionals, there is another fly in the ointment: the rapid acceleration of **de-risking**. What started as a move to safeguard the **global financial system** is now creating a bottleneck that threatens to stifle the very businesses that power our world.

### Key Takeaways

- **De-risking Paradox**: While intended to reduce **financial crime**, wholesale de-risking often pushes transactions into **unregulated channels**, increasing systemic danger.
- **SME Fragility**: Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) lack the **compliance** infrastructure to satisfy the **risk appetite** of global **financial institutions**.
- **Supply Chain Vulnerability**: As **banks** exit high-risk corridors, **supply chains** face disruption, threatening **national interests** and **economic security**.

---

## The Backbone of the Global Economy

Small and medium-sized enterprises are not just participants in the market; they are the market. They represent approximately 90% of all **businesses** and over 50% of employment globally. In **other countries**, particularly emerging economies, they contribute 33% of GDP and 45% of formal jobs.

However, being the “backbone” also means being the most exposed. SMEs are almost always downstream in the **supply chain**. When a multinational corporation or a major bank shifts its **economic policy**, the pressure flows downward. If a Tier 1 supplier is forced to undergo rigorous **anti money laundering** (AML) checks, the Tier 3 micro-business often finds itself locked out of the **financial sector** entirely because it cannot prove its **transparency** at a cost-effective rate.

---

## What De-Risking Means for Financial Institutions

In its simplest form, de-risking is the wholesale or targeted withdrawal of services by **financial institutions** from perceived **high risk** **clients**. This is not always about a specific wrongdoing. Often, it is a cold calculation of **profitability** versus **compliance** **costs**.

**Financial institutions terminating** **business relationships** frequently cite the high cost of meeting **FATF recommendations**. Global **banks** have significantly reduced their correspondent banking links. This has severely limited **access** to cross-border payment rails in emerging markets.

> **Industry Perspective**: “The move toward de-risking is often a blunt instrument used to satisfy regulators, but it inadvertently undermines **financial inclusion efforts**,” notes a senior researcher at the **World Bank Group (**[**WBG**](https://www.worldbank.org/ext/en/home)**)**.

The distinction is critical: there is a difference between a case-by-case **risk based approach** and a blanket exclusion driven by reputational **concerns**. For SMEs, this distinction is the difference between survival and insolvency.

---

## Drivers: National Security and Economic Coercion

The shift in **national security** policy has expanded the rationale for **restricting business relationships**. We are seeing **economic coercion** used as a tool of statecraft. This prompts firms to avoid jurisdictions like **China** or specific regions in the Middle East that are deemed geopolitically sensitive.

Strengthened **anti money laundering** regimes and the fear of **terrorist financing** have raised the bar for **due diligence**. When the **European Union** or the **European Council (**[**CEU**](https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2026/02/17/taxation-council-updates-the-eu-list-of-non-cooperative-jurisdictions-for-tax-purposes/)**)** updates its list of non-cooperative jurisdictions, **financial institutions** often react by closing **accounts** rather than managing the **risk**.

### How this affects SMEs:

SMEs don’t have the legal teams to navigate these geopolitical landmines. When a **financial system** tightens, the small player is the first to be “off-boarded” to protect the bank’s **profits**.

---

## Impacts on Financial Inclusion and Supply Chains

**Financial inclusion** is a pillar of modern **ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) practices** reporting, specifically under the Social (S) and Governance (G) categories of frameworks like the **CSRD** (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive). Yet, de-risking works in direct opposition to these **financial inclusion** goals.

When **banks** exit a market, **vulnerable** populations and SMEs lose **access** to basic banking. This disrupts [**supplier sustainability**](https://esgthereport.com/how-to-evaluate-supplier-sustainability-practical-esg-guide-for-smes/) and [introduces vendor risk](https://esgthereport.com/vendor-risk-assessment-questionnaire-framework/). If a key supplier in a developing nation can no longer receive **funds** through **regulated channels**, the entire **value chain** is compromised.

| **Feature** | **Traditional De-Risking** | **Risk-Based Management** |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Strategy** | Blanket termination of high-risk sectors. | Case-by-case assessment and mitigation. |
| **Impact on SMEs** | Immediate loss of banking access. | Continued access with enhanced reporting. |
| **Financial Crime Risk** | High (pushes money to the shadows). | Low (maintains visibility of funds). |
| **ESG Alignment** | Poor (undermines social inclusion). | High (promotes equity and transparency). |

---

## How De-Risking Increases Money Laundering Risks

Here is the irony: de-risking can actually increase **money laundering** and **terrorist financing risks**. When formal **financial sector** channels are closed, **businesses** do not simply stop existing. They move to **unregulated channels** and **cash**-based **transactions**.

This opacity makes it impossible for **governments** and **organizations** to track the flow of **money**. By closing correspondent relationships, **banks** weaken the global ability to monitor and share information.

### How this affects SMEs:

SMEs are forced into the “grey market” to pay their workers or buy raw materials. This inadvertently makes them look even higher risk to future partners, creating a vicious cycle of **financial exclusion**.

---

## High-Risk Sectors and Client Profiles

Certain **sectors** are perpetual targets for de-risking:

1. **Money Service Businesses** (MSBs)
2. Remittance corridors
3. **Nonprofit organizations**
4. Trade finance

**Clients** with complex ownership structures or those involving Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) are also flagged. For an SME, even a minor **involvement** with a **high risk** jurisdiction can lead to a **termination** of their banking **accounts**.

---

## Role of New Technologies in Mitigation

**New technologies** offer a glimmer of hope. **Fintech** and **blockchain** tools can reduce **compliance** **costs** for low-value cross-border **transactions**.

- **Digital Identity**: Streamlines **anti money laundering** checks.
- **Mobile Money**: Substitutes formal banking where correspondent **access** has failed.
- **AI Monitoring**: Helps **financial institutions** **manage** **risk** without blanket bans.

However, these **technologies** also introduce **operational risks** that SMEs must learn to navigate.

---

## Regulatory Landscape: FATF and ISSB

The **Financial Action Task Force** ([FATF](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/home.html)) explicitly states that **fatf standards** do not require de-risking. In fact, **fatf recommendations** promote a **risk based approach**. They encourage simplified **due diligence** in low-risk situations to **promote financial inclusion**.

Despite this, many **countries** over-regulate to avoid **sanctions**. This “gold-plating” of **regulations** adds another layer of **compliance** that SMEs cannot afford.

---

## Practical Evidence-Based Strategies

How do we fix this? **Private sector** collaboration is key.

- **Data-Sharing Hubs**: Reduce the duplication of **compliance** efforts.
- **Capacity Building**: Helping local **banks** in **other countries** meet global standards.
- **Proportionate Regulation**: Ensuring **costs** do not outweigh the **benefits** for small **transactions**.

---

## Actions and Metrics for SMEs and Procurement

To survive the de-risking wave, SMEs and procurement teams must be proactive, using structured [ESG audit best practices](https://esgthereport.com/what-is-esg/the-g-in-esg/what-is-an-esg-audit/) to evidence how they manage compliance risks.

### 5 Ways SMEs Can Buff Their ESG Profile for Banks:

1. **Maintain a Clean Audit Trail**: Use **technologies** that record every transaction.
2. **Adopt a Formal ESG Policy**: Even a simple **policy** shows **governance** maturity.
3. **Respond Promptly to Questionnaires**: Treat [**ESG Questionnaires**](https://esgthereport.com/esg-questionnaire-a-practical-guide-for-smes-under-supply-chain-pressure/) as a priority, not an afterthought.
4. **Diversify Banking Relationships**: Don’t rely on a single **financial institution**.
5. **Seek Certification**: Use recognized standards to prove **transparency**.

**Procurement** teams should track KPIs such as the percentage of suppliers with **bank accounts** and the share of payments routed through **regulated channels**.

---

## Measurement and Reporting

**ESG** readiness is now a prerequisite for **financial** **access**, and stronger [ESG scores and ratings](https://esgthereport.com/what-is-an-esg-score/) increasingly influence whether SMEs can secure affordable capital. Evidence-based disclosures should link **due diligence** to **financial inclusion** impacts. By documenting case-by-case AML mitigations, SMEs can demonstrate they are not “high risk” but “highly managed.”

---

## Policy Responses and Multi-Stakeholder Solutions

International coordination must align **economic security** with **financial inclusion**. **Governments** should invest in digital ID infrastructure to help integrate **vulnerable** jurisdictions into the **global financial system**.

### How this affects SMEs:

When **policy** is clear and **regulations** are proportionate, SMEs can focus on **progress** and [balancing people, planet, and profitability](https://esgthereport.com/planet-people-profit/) rather than just keeping their bank accounts open.

---

## Case Studies: Real-World Impacts

In some remittance-dependent economies, de-risking has led to a 40% drop in formal transfers. Conversely, **fintech** interventions in certain trade corridors have restored **access** to **funds**, proving that **innovation** can overcome **risk** aversion.

For the SME, the message is clear: the **world** is de-risking, and you must be ready to prove your worth.

---

### FAQs

**1. What is de-risking in simple terms?** It is when banks stop providing services to certain groups or regions to avoid potential legal or [financial risks](https://esgthereport.com/third-party-risk-management-a-practical-guide-for-smes/) associated with money laundering or sanctions.

**2. Why are SMEs targeted by de-risking?** SMEs often lack the robust compliance systems of larger firms, making them appear “high risk” or too expensive for banks to monitor properly.

**3. How does de-risking impact global supply chains?** It creates bottlenecks where [suppliers in “high-risk” areas](https://esgthereport.com/esg-supplier-questionnaire-equals-supply-chain-resilience/) cannot receive payments, leading to delays, increased costs, and vendor instability.

**4. What is the FATF’s stance on de-risking?** The FATF discourages wholesale de-risking and promotes a “risk-based approach” that balances security with financial inclusion.

**5. Can technology help prevent de-risking?** Yes, tools like blockchain and AI-driven monitoring can lower compliance costs and increase transparency, making SMEs more attractive to banks.

**6. What is the “de-risking paradox”?** By kicking “risky” clients out of banks, they move to unregulated channels, which actually makes it harder for authorities to catch real criminals.

**7. How does de-risking affect ESG scores?** Excluding SMEs from the financial system can hurt a company’s “Social” score, as it undermines financial inclusion and economic equity.

**8. What can an SME do if their bank account is closed?** They should seek alternative fintech solutions, improve their transparency through ESG reporting, and maintain clear records of all transactions.

**9. Are certain countries more affected by de-risking?** Yes, emerging markets and countries with perceived high levels of corruption or political instability face the most significant correspondent banking exits.

**10. Why is trade finance so vulnerable to de-risking?** Trade finance involves complex cross-border transactions and multiple parties, making it a high-effort, high-scrutiny area for bank compliance departments.

---

> ### About ESG The Report
> 
> 
> **ESG The Report** is your trusted source for straightforward, up-to-date insights on environmental, social, and governance reporting. We focus on sustainable strategies, **ethical supply chains**, **ESG reporting solutions**, and **impact assessments** that help businesses and investors make better decisions. Through expert commentary and practical research, we show how ESG practices lead to [real-world results](https://esgthereport.com/the-impact-of-tariffs-on-global-supply-chains/) for companies and communities.
> 
> 
> Transparency, accountability, and innovation drive everything we do. Our easy-to-read articles cover **climate change**, **ESG reporting without expensive software**, **responsible resource use,**[**artificial intelligence**](https://esgthereport.com/ai-washing-the-rising-threat-of-artificial-intelligence-deception/)**and machine learning**, and **diversity initiatives** that matter. We focus heavily on the complexities of the **supply chain**, providing tools for **ESG Questionnaires**, **value chain** mapping, and **vendor risk** management. Our goal is to help you navigate **supplier**[**sustainability policies**](https://esgthereport.com/what-is-a-sustainability-audit/) and ensure your **private sector** involvement leads to long-term success. Micro, SME, Corporate or [Non-Corporate](https://esgthereport.com/what-is-a-non-corporate-organization/), stay connected. Get our clear, actionable insights and join a growing community that values responsible business.

---

###  
